An exploration of the serious/fun/ridiculous - past/present/future of the brain and the science that loves it....but this site is dead so visit the new omnibrain: http://scienceblogs.com/omnibrain

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Kodak, the new bouncer.

Here is an interesting patent I came across from Kodak-
The age class of a human subject is ascertained in a digital image. The subject has a redeye defect pair; each defect having one or more defect pixels. In the method, two regions of pixels corresponding to the defects are identified. The distance between the regions is measured. A region size is determined, based upon the size of at least one of the regions. An age class is determined from the distance and region size.

Here is a little snipit from New Scientist:
Red-eye age checker

This could be bad news for under-age drinkers and anyone else trying to lie about their age.

Camera maker Kodak is adapting the technology used to automatically correct flash-induced "red-eye" in digital images to determine a person's age. A patent filed by researchers from the company's labs in Rochester, New York, suggests the technique could provide a quick and easy way to check someone's date of birth.

Red-eye is the effect seen when a person's open pupils allow a camera's flash light to be reflected off their retinas. Red eye correction software analyses a picture, looking for a pair of red dots in the centre of a face, and automatically dulls them to remove the effect.

Kodak's patent mentions previous research suggesting a correlation between age and the way pupils react to light. As a person gets older, their pupils have greater difficulty widening to cope with dim light, it says.

The company suggests that an age-verification system could take mug shots of a person from a set distance in controlled lighting, using a flash. Software would then measure the size of their red-eye dots to determine how wide their pupils are and make an estimate of their age.

Although the patent doesn't say how accurate the system could be it suggests that accuracy could be boosted by automatically looking for wrinkles and grey hair in an image as well.

The picture is a bouncer... get it! haha.. sooo stupid.

posted by Steve at 4/26/2006 10:55:00 PM  

1 Comments:

Anonymous said...

this is cool only if it's accurate, though. If it's as accurate as looking for grey hair and wrinkles then it could be decades off and it seems like how old you "look" would still be the best indicator.

Thu Apr 27, 12:58:29 PM CDT

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home