Sunday, April 16, 2006
Contributors
Previous Posts
- The neuroscience of defeat
- Lazy Eyes
- Ahhh...speed dating
- Top Science Myths
- Quantum Psychology .. ok maybe not but anyway
- More science and literature
- Older kids not actually smarter than their younger siblings
- Scientific Literature - Ian McEwan Essay
- CNN/Money Magazine declares college professor the 2nd best job
- The analog digital hybrid: The human brain



2 Comments:
Ahh.. here's a description from amazon UK:
"Book Description
The past 20 years have seen unparalleled advances in neurobiology, with findings from neuroscience being used to shed light on a range of human activities - many historically the province of those in the humanities and social sciences - aesthetics, emotion, consciousness, music. Applying this new knowledge to law seems a natural development - the making, considering, and enforcing of law of course rests on mental processes. However, where some of those activities can be studied
with a certain amount of academic detachment, what we discover about the brain has considerable implications for how we consider and judge those who follow or indeed flout the law - with inevitable social and political consequences. There are real issues that the legal system will face as neurobiological studies continue to relentlessly probe the human mind - the motives for our actions, our decision making processes, and such issues as free will and responsibility.
This volume represents a first serious attempt to address questions of law as reflecting brain activity, emphasizing that it is the organization and functioning of the brain that determines how we enact and obey laws. It applies the most recent developments in brain science to debates over criminal responsibility, cooperation and punishment, deception, moral and legal judgment, property, evolutionary psychology, law and economics, and decision-making by judges and juries. Written and edited by
leading specialists from a range of disciplines, the book presents a groundbreaking and challenging new look at human behaviour."
Sun Apr 16, 02:00:27 PM CDT
It actually looks like an OK book. I read the Fugelsang and Dunbar chapter a while back, before the book came out, and liked it. I never know how seriously to take these books, though. Even though they're published by academic press, and edited by "experts," I can't help but getting the impression that sometimes I'm reading about pet theories and perspectives, and not mainstream science.
Sun Apr 16, 05:07:52 PM CDT
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home